Archive for May, 2008

Good Food, Shame About the Sh*t Service

My wife treated some of her contractors to dinner a couple of nights ago. They all went to a renovated restaurant a few miles outside town where my wife had been a week or so earlier for a birthday meal with friends.

The table was booked for 8pm and they turned up shortly after 7.30 so they could chat in the bar and relax a little before sitting down to eat. Laura went to order the drinks. The barman apologised and told her that it was his first night and that he was finding his way around. Laura sympathised and gave her order. The guy did his best but it was soon clear that not only was this his first night at this bar but it was his first night in any bar. He couldn’t tell wine glasses from tumblers and a house wine from a vintage bottle.

What made Laura frustrated above all else was that there was another barman there who was perhaps meant to be overseeing the new guy’s work but who offered no help at all. When the new barman had wandered off in yet another futile attempt to select the right glass or bottle, Laura approached the other barman and suggested that 20 minutes was a long time to wait for a simple round of drinks for seven people. This is the conversation they had:

Barman: He explained it was his first night.
Laura: I know and I’m trying to avoid making him feel self-conscious but 20 minutes is too long.
Barman: You’re just going to have to put up with it.

That’s it. No offer to help. Laura then told him she had a table booked for 8pm and asked if he could tell the woman at the desk they were here but running late in the bar. She received a grunt in response and the man walked off.

It took another 15 minutes to get their drinks, by which time they had no time to drink them so picked everything up and walked through to the restaurant. More great service. The woman told them she had let their table go because they were late (it was 8.20 and obviously the barman had not passed on the message). Laura stood her ground and the woman told them to return to the bar and she’d call them. A table was finishing up. ‘How long?’ asked Laura. ‘No more than 10 minutes,’ replied the woman.

It was a further hour before they were finally seated. Had the restaurant been in town or had their been somewhere to go close by they would have left but everyone had come by cab and there is nothing along that stretch of road but fields. The food was good (which is one of the reasons Laura had wanted to return) but the whole experience was ruined before anything reached their mouths.

Laura is going to write a letter to the manager of the restaurant, of course, and to the owners. She has since discovered that it (The Arkle Manor) is owned by Landmark Leisure – part of M&B. What’s more important is that Laura’s bad experience became the bad experience of six others that night and that the aggressive and dismissive attitude of one barman and the confrontation attitude of the woman on the desk means that the Arkle Manor will live in their minds for a long time. None of them will return and all of them will relate the experience to their friends, family, and colleagues. Leaving an untrained barman to cope alone (and none of the blame is his) has become an expensive mistake.

Perhaps Laura should have raised merry hell at the time and demanded to speak to the manager. But why should she have to? How would that have improved the mood of the evening? I wonder if the chef knows the excellent food is being undermined by a front of house who obviously couldn’t care.

And the salient point of this little rant? If you provide no easy way for customers to describe their experiences in a forum connected to your enterprise (ie a comments section on your web page), they will resort to whatever uncontrolled medium is available. Word spreads, monitoring and responding to comments becomes difficult, and one customer’s bad night becomes a growing stain on your reputation. Perhaps not tonight or next week but once it’s on the web, it stays there and can come back to bite you on the medium rare rump steak at any time.

Was That Your Reputation We Just Passed?

Mike Southon, co-author of “The Beermat Entrepreneur”, has a weekly column in the FT. It forms part of the ‘Entrepreneur’ section, which, in turn, sits at the the back of the Saturday ‘Your Money’ section. This obviously involves some newsprint origami before you reach it but it’s usually worth the effort.

I miss it occasionally and yesterday browsed the column titles on the FT web site to catch up with anything that appeared interesting. The title that immediately got my attention was ‘Reputations precede you‘. Southon rarely discusses the internet per se but here was a subject – the combination of entrepreneurs and reputation – that seemed a perfect fit for an examination of how on-line tools can enhance or damage a brand or its owners.

Here is what Southon said about reputation and the internet:

“Your reputation is defined by your case studies, which should be refreshed on your website and in your literature as often as possible.”

That’s it. Seriously. Over 700 words on reputation and entrepreneurs and not a single mention of a ‘blog’ or a ‘forum’ or a ‘podcast’. Not even a hint that a quick check of Google or Technorati (for instance) could show you what your global reputation might be.

Southon’s starting point for his column is a report issues by Coutts, bankers to the wealthy. It appears they have at least 18,000 entrepreneurs as their customers. It would also appear that those 18,000 care little for what an internet-based network of their partners, colleagues, and customers might be saying about them and their services or products. The thrust of the report is towards being in control of your PR by knowing everything about your company and then controlling the messages you deliver to ‘the media’. By ‘the media’, of course, is meant traditional press outlets. This is inevitable, since the report has been written by a PR professional at a top rank PR company with a web site that you can search for a long time without finding any evidence that the internet could form part of any integrated communications strategy.

But that’s by the way. Stuck like this in the world of reacting to the impact of traditional media means allowing your reputation management to turn like an oil tanker when what you need is the handling of a speed boat. The report’s author ends with a Japanese proverb:

“The reputation of a thousand years may be determined by the conduct of an hour”.

This was from a period before your company’s share price could be irrevocably damaged in the time it takes to watch the cherry blossom fall. The proverb needs updating:

“The reputation of your brand may be determined by the speed and manner of your reaction to a blog post read by a thousand customers.”

Fighting Cats

When my wife and I bought our first place – a converted top floor flat in north London – it was at a time when property prices were at a peak and interest rates were around 13.5%. We were both working for Reuters at the time and found a mortgage fairly easily but by the time we moved in, we had spare cash for a bed and little else.

On a Saturday morning shortly after we moved in, we took a walk around the area and found a small art gallery on the main road. In the window was a framed print called ‘Fighting Cats’ by Michelle Tippett. Our new flat was bright and the living area had a small mezzanine, which meant there was one side of the room with a large white wall. This picture, with its black wooden frame, looked perfect for hanging in the middle of that space. Both of us immediately felt drawn to the picture but the price!

Reason told us that to buy it was sheer extravagance, that there were other, much more important purchases to be made if our new home was going to function as more than a large waiting room with clothes on the floor. Reason told us that friends and family would consider us not only reckless but also ungrateful for the help and advice we had been given over the previous weeks if we bought a print ahead of a sofa or even some pots and pans.

Reason lost out, of course, and those Fighting Cats were the only thing we took with us from that flat when we got posted to Singapore less than a year later. The print now hangs in its fourth house. No sofa and no pots and pans remain from that Highgate flat.

Every time I enter our house, it’s Fighting Cats that I see first. It hangs in the hall like a welcome memory. Sometimes, reason can stop you making the right choice. Buying that print led to a couple of uncomfortable months but it was our first risky decision taken as a couple and it gave us the taste for more: moving to Singapore, having three children, leaving full-time employment and setting up our own – separate – businesses. And we’re bound more by those cats than would have been possible with any set of quality kitchen tools.

If you meet your own Fighting Cats, don’t turn your back.